Does Wine Spectator ever go back and update tasting notes and scores for older wines?

Ask Dr Vinny

Hello there! I'm Dr. Vinifera, but you can call me Vinny. Ask me your toughest wine questions, from the fine points of etiquette to the science of winemaking. And don't worry, I'm no wine snob—you can also ask me those "dumb questions" you're too embarrased to ask your wine geek friends! I hope you find my answers educational, empowering and even amusing. And don't forget to check out my most asked questions and my full archives for all my Q&A classics.

Dear Dr. Vinny,

Wine Spectator's tasters sometimes taste wines from barrel and then give them a preliminary score range. Then they blind taste the wines shortly after they're bottled, when an official score is given to the wine. If wine is always evolving in the bottle as it ages, do the tasters ever go back and update their tasting notes and scores a few more years or decades down the line?

Denis, Lake Worth, Fla.

Dear Denis,

The vast majority of our reviews are blind tastings of new releases of finished wines. Of the 14,000 wines we review annually, there are usually only a couple hundred each year that are barrel tastings or cellar notes. We reserve those for categories like Bordeaux, where the wine is often presold as futures, and we think our readers want to know how a particular vintage is shaping up.

It’s pretty clear to figure out which ratings are barrel tastings. When you look in our database, where a score normally would be, you’ll see “BT,” which stands for “barrel tasting.” At the end of the tasting note, you’ll see a score range, because we feel a four-point spread is a better way to evaluate an unfinished wine.

Unless a review specifically notes that the tasting is non-blind, that means the wine was reviewed blind. Yep, that means our tasting department takes the time to hide the identity of the producers before the wines are tasted, so that every château gets a fair shot. Is it a lot of work? Absolutely. Is it worth it? You bet.

When we review a wine in barrel, we typically go back and review it again after it’s been released. Those wines go through the same blind-tasting protocol, and then a final score is assigned, as well as a drink recommendation.

And yes, sometimes we go back to see how wines are evolving, in retrospective tastings. These are also typically blind tastings (unless otherwise noted). Most recently, our tasters have reviewed top wines from the 2005, 2003 and 2001 vintages of Bordeaux, the 2008 vintage or Oregon Pinot Noir, the 2007 vintage of California Cabernet, and 1997 Vintage Port.

We take our blind-tasting protocol very seriously and use it whenever possible, because we believe it is the fairest way to assess wine.

—Dr. Vinny

Blind Tasting Ask Dr. Vinny

More In Dr. Vinny

What’s the difference between Tuscany and “super Tuscan” wines?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny shares a short primer on Tuscany's key wine designations.

Aug 8, 2022

What’s the minimum amount of alcohol in wine?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains how "wine" is legally defined in terms of …

Aug 2, 2022

Why are some of Wine Spectator’s reviews "web only"? What does that mean?

Wine Spectator's resident wine expert Dr. Vinny explains why some of Wine Spectator's …

Jul 26, 2022

What’s the deal with wine “legs”?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains the science behind wine "legs," or "tears," and …

Jul 18, 2022

What is “dry” wine? Aren’t all wines wet …?

Wine Spectator's resident wine expert Dr. Vinny explains what makes a wine "dry" vs. …

Jul 12, 2022

What does "père et fils" indicate on a wine label?

Wine Spectator's expert Dr. Vinny explains a few of the French terms you might see on a …

Jul 5, 2022